Thinking Strategically
HONORS 259L Fall, 2018
Current Reading
List/Syllabus (Topics may be added)
Professor
Daniel
R. Vincent
Tydings 4128B
301-405-3485
dvincent@umd.edu
Office
Hours: Thursday, 12:30-1:45
Required Text
The
text for the class is The Art of Strategy,
by Avinash Dixit and Barry Nalebuff.
Towards the end of the course, I will also make use of Alvin Roth, Who Gets
What and Why, 2016, Mariner Books, 2016, ISBN
978-0-544-70528-9 and Dan Ariely, Predictably Irrational,
2010. We will likely refer to other readings as the
course progresses. A natural resource might by Thomas
Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, for example.
Since no one textbook covers all the issue I wish to
discuss, I also will try to point you to brief online
sources in order to save you from having to buy too many
texts.
Course
Description
This course is
designed to use the tools of decision theory and game theory
to understand economic, political and social problems and
issues. Among other topics, it will examine the fallacy of
sunk costs; techniques to determine the credibility of threats
and promises; the importance of identifying dominated
strategies; the potential value of randomizing strategies; the
importance of knowing how much rivals know before choosing a
strategy. We will also examine some case studies such as using
auction theory and matching theory in the design of markets.
While mathematical skills such as calculus and algebra will
increase the student�s enjoyment of the course, these are not
required. What is required is a willingness to think formally
and analytically about strategic problems and a curious mind.
Web
Site
The
Web page for this course is http://econweb.umd.edu/~vincent/honors/HNROL.html. You will be able to
find the problem sets, a link to the Department of Economics
Web page. This is a fairly new course so I am afraid there are
only a few old exams or assignments available.
Please let me know if you find any bugs in the page
and please send me suggestions on ways to make it more useful.
Assignments
include problem sets, a mid-term and final exam, and an
applied project with a class presentation component.
Lectures
will be given in TYD (Tydings), 1114 on Tues-Thurs at 2:00
(Find it here:
http://seamster.cs.umd.edu:8090/map/index.html#).
The first lecture is Tuesday, August 28.
Course Outline:
1.
Introduction and The Various Notions of Costs and their
Role In Decision-making:
o
o The
Sunk Cost Fallacy.
Some
short online references:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_cost
http://www.economist.com/RESEARCH/ECONOMICS/searchActionTerms.cfm?query=opportunity+cost
http://www.economist.com/RESEARCH/ECONOMICS/searchActionTerms.cfm?query=marginal+cost
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_costs
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SunkCostFallacy
2.
Dynamic Decision-making
Deciding at the margin.
Decision Trees
Back to Front Reasoning and playing games against
your future self.
Art of Strategy, Chapter
2.
3.
Dynamic Games
Back to Front Reasoning again.
Threats and Promises � When are they credible?
Examples
Art of Strategy, Chapters 2 and 7.
4.
Strategies and Games
Descriptions and Examples
Dominant and Dominated Strategies
The Prisoners� Dilemma
Art of Strategy, Chapters 3 and 4.
5.
Random Behavior � Why It Can Help to Be Unpredictable.
Art of Strategy, Chapter 5
6.
Information and Common Knowledge: Do you know that he
knows that you know that.....?
An email game of common knowledge
Common knowledge and the dotted tribe.
Art of Strategy, Chapter 8.
7.
Auctions and the design of trading institutions.
The different types of auctions
Optimal bidding behavior
Revenue Equivalence
The winner�s curse
Art of Strategy, Chapter 10.
8.
Matching Algorithms and Their Uses.
One and Two-sided Matching
The Deferred Acceptance Algorithm
Top Trading Cycles
Kidney exchanges
9.
Behavioral Economics.
Grading:
Your grade will be determined as follows:
5(or
6) Problem Sets
30 points
Midterm
Score
50 points
Assignment
50 points
Final
exam
70 points
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
200 points
Project Rubric: I would like you to find a situation, event or example of any aspect of daily life that involves strategic thinking. Examples include scenes from a film, situations in a sporting game, rules of a sport, historical events, social interactions etc. The project involves a classroom presentation and a write-up of your project. Typically the written work is about five pages.
Projects are to be completed with one or two other students in the class. I urge you to see me first (I would like to talk to all members of the group) to discuss your ideas. Please confirm your group and date by October 11.
The presentation should describe your strategic problem and give the class a sense of how to apply tools from the course to solve it. It is worth 10 points.
The written part should consist of a more full description of the situation and a detailed exposition of how applying game theory tools can be used to improve performance or understanding. Please note that since you are modeling something from life, the simpler you make your model the better luck you will have in solving it so do not worry about capturing all the details, just the bare minimum that are relevant. The point breakdown for this part is roughly: 15 points for a clear description and model of the problem and illustration of how it applies to tools used in this course, 15 points for a correct use of tools to �solve� the problem, 10 points for creativity and originality.
The
University
policy on grading requires me to use the grading system I
announce at the beginning of the semester in all cases. I cannot make any
exceptions to that rule.
Academic Integrity & the
The University is an academic community. Its fundamental
purpose is the pursuit of knowledge. Like all other
communities, the University can function properly only if its
members adhere to clearly established goals and values.
Essential to the fundamental purpose of the University is the
commitment to the principles of truth and academic
honesty. Accordingly, the Code of Academic Integrity is
designed to ensure that the principle of academic honesty is
upheld. While all members of the University share this
responsibility, The Code of Academic Integrity is designed so
that special responsibility for upholding the principle of
academic honesty lies with the students. (The
All
I pledge on my honor
that I have not given or received any unauthorized
assistance on this assignment/examination.
The
The
Examinations
The
schedule for the course exams is as follows:
Midterm
Exam
Tuesday, October 16
2:00 PM � 3:15 PM
Final
Exam
*
*
* I
believe we must wait for a time assignment.
NOTE: Students who have a team conflict should let me
know right away. Otherwise, travel obligations DO NOT
constitute a valid excuse. If you have travel plans that
conflict with the exam schedule you should change them now
or drop the course now. It is your responsibility to ensure
you are available for the midterms and final exam.
Students
with learning disabilities who require special exam procedures
should get in touch with DSS and let me know as soon as
possible.
CourseEvalUM*
Your participation in the evaluation of courses through CourseEvalUM
is a responsibility you hold as a student member of
our academic community. Your feedback is confidential and
important to the improvement of teaching and learning at
the University as well as to the tenure and promotion
process. CourseEvalUM will be
open for you to complete your evaluations for fall semester
courses between Tuesday, December 1 and Sunday, December
13. You can go directly to the website (www.courseevalum.umd.edu)
to complete your evaluations starting December 1. By
completing all of your evaluations each semester, you will
have the privilege of accessing the summary reports for
thousands of courses online at Testudo.
--