@article{KSW_het,<br />
    author = "Mel Win Khaw and Luminita Stevens and Michael Woodford",<br />
    title  = "{Individual differences in the perception of probability}",<br />
    year   = {2021},<br />
	journal={PLoS computational biology},<br />
	month   = {April},<br />
    abstract = "{In recent studies of humans estimating non-stationary probabilities, estimates appear to be unbiased on average, across the full range of probability values to be estimated. This finding is surprising given that experiments measuring probability estimation in other contexts have often identified \textit{conservatism}: individuals tend to overestimate low probability events and underestimate high probability events. In other contexts, \textit{repulsive} biases have also been documented, with individuals producing judgments that tend toward extreme values instead. Using extensive data from a probability estimation task that produces unbiased performance on average, we find substantial biases at the individual level, and we document the coexistence of both conservative and repulsive biases in the same context. Individual biases persist despite extensive experience with the task, and are also correlated with other behavioral differences, such as individual variation in response speed and adjustment rates. We conclude that the rich computational demands of our task give rise to a variety of behavioral patterns, and that the apparent unbiasedness of the pooled data is an artifact of the aggregation of heterogeneous biases.}"<br />
}